RSS Feed
May 6

Celibacy is the new black

Posted on Thursday, May 6, 2010 in dating, Happiness, Honesty, masturbation, Relationships, Sex/sexuality, Singles

“I’ve decided to be like Lady Gaga,” Sara announced as we worked up a sweat on the treadmills the other day.

“Sara, don’t. There’s nothing about parading around half-naked in ridiculous outfits and even worse hair that could be flattering for a woman your age.”

My age?! And you are how old?”

“OK, OK — our age.”

“Agreed. But that’s not what I’m talking about.”      

“Puh-lease don’t tell me you want to start singing …”

“Of course not! But, did you hear what she said the other day? Her Gaganess said she’s OK being celibate until she has the time to meet someone she wants to sleep with. Well, that’s me.”

“That is so not you!”

“That’s the new me.”

“You’re kidding me. Weren’t you just on Match the other day? What were you looking for — a handyman?”

“Well, I’ve had a change of heart. I’m going to check out Bcelebate.”

I lost my footing and nearly flew off the treadmill. “Is that a …”

“Yes, a Web site for the abstinent-minded — like me.”

“Whatever.”

I know Sara well enough to know that those sorts of proclamations rarely last long; the last time she swore off chocolate she made it to, oh, 4 p.m.

But, there is a movement toward women being celibate — to which I say, are they crazy?

Unless they’re nuns, because, you know, that’s OK.

I’m not dissing celibacy for religious reasons, if that’s important to you. And, it’s OK if you’re trying to get your life together because you’re always falling for the bad boys or you’re newly divorced or something like that; you just can’t be emotionally healthy to enjoy sex at those times.

Even Lady Gaga’s celibacy makes some some sense: she prefers to get to know someone before she gets sexual, and she just doesn’t have time for that right now. “If you can’t get to know somebody,” she says, “you shouldn’t be having sex with them.”

You go, girl! Although I’d call that Celibate Lite, because I’m sure if someone worth going gaga over came along, she’d change her tune quickly.

But I wonder about wearing the celibacy badge as if you’re somewhat holier than those of us who say, yeah, I’m too busy to have a relationship right now, but I have a few, uh, needs. And my fingers are tired, and my batteries have run out. I just wanna get laid.

Those of us who see our sexuality as a natural expression of who and what we are. I mean, I’m all for National Masturbation Month — which May is, BTW — but I’m just celebrating in between the regular sex (and when Sean wants to watch, obviously).

It seems like a “thing” some women who aren’t getting any action have to declare as way to either justify why they aren’t getting any action or to deny their sexuality.

OK, there are lots of women (and maybe men, too) who can’t or don’t want to have sex just for the sake of sex. I respect that.

And there are plenty of times when we’re just not connecting with anyone so forget about dating, let alone a relationship and guaranteed sex. That’s just part of being single.

Then there are the people who lose interest in sex as they age. I can’t see doing that, however. Too bad the spinster is stigmatized, but then again, so is the slut.

We can still find ways to have intimacy and live sensually if not sexually (getting a massage — with a male masseuse — can fuel a gal’s fantasy or two).

But I just can’t see embracing celibacy as a “new way to be.”

Can you?

Feb 10

I’m digging those good vibrations

Posted on Wednesday, February 10, 2010 in Happiness, masturbation, Relationships, Sex/sexuality, Singles

The way things happen around my house is the way things happen when celebrities hit the dust — in threes.

First, my CD player was flipping out, then the kitchen grinder became useless and then  — at the most inopportune time — I fried my B.O.B.

You can probably guess which upset me the most.

So, I had to take care of it as soon as possible, which would have been immediately but there were other silly things — oh, like work, a school event, seeing my tax accountant — that I had to attend to first.
I just hate when life gets in the way of the fun parts.

By the time I had a moment to breathe, the odd phenomenon that often hits women kicked in. I got a call from Mia. She and I were in sync — but since we’re menopausal, it wasn’t about our periods.

“Hey, I have to go to Pleasures. My vibrator’s on the fritz. Wanna come?”

“Are you serious? I was just going to head over there because I fried mine weeks ago and I’m desperate. There’s just so much I can ask of my fingers.”

“Good,” she said. “I’ll see you in 10.”

Now, I haven’t bought a vibrator in a while,
so when I walked in and saw all the choices, it was quite overwhelming.
It felt a little like the first time I tried online dating — this one’s awfully cute but that one’s bigger and stronger, this one’s built for speed but that one looks like a, uh, multitasker.

I was confused (especially by the ones that are shaped like animals; since when is gopher a turn-on?)

“So, which one are leaning toward?” I asked Mia.

“I want one that hits all the right spots. You?”

All the spots?  My old vibrator was a basic Pocket Rocket. I like the simplest, most straight-forward one, one that get the job done quickly so I can get on to other things, like sleep, without having every part of me stimulated. The last thing I want to do is have an orgy of one.

“Um, I think I want something simple, something Sean and I can play with together.”

“Really? Doesn’t he get upset if you have to bring in ammo?”

“What do you mean?”

“Isn’t he jealous of your vibrator?”

Jealous of my vibrator? No, he isn’t, thankfully, nor is it a matter of “have to.” But I got what Mia was saying — some guys get really tweaked if their woman has a selection of vibrating, pulsating sex toys.

Why?

Could it have anything to do with, oh, say, length, girth, endurance …

Ahem.

Still, I don’t know of a woman who would choose a B.O.B. over a man, ever, despite all the jokes: “vibrators are never too busy watching the game on TV; it doesn’t leave a mess behind; it doesn’t care that you gained 10 pounds; it doesn’t fall asleep and snore in your ear afterward: when we’re done with them we can stuff them back in the drawer and not hear from them until we’re ready,” etc.

OK, yes — vibrators are great. Can’t orgasm through intercourse? No problem! And for single gals, it’s what helps us stay sane during the dry spells without having to rely on booty-calls, especially if we feel conflicted about them. They’re an essential part of being sexual beings, not to mention that they just make us feel so good!

But jealous? Look, we’re not going to get “addicted”; it doesn’t mean you’re not man enough for us; and no, we’re going to permanently replace you with a Magic Wand. Still, when even Men’s Health offers tips on how to “outperform her vibrator,” a woman’s got to wonder — is this really an issue for guys?

Because I can guarantee you, we gals aren’t losing any sleep over blow-up dolls. Or your right hand.

In the end, I came home with a Pocket Rocket again; it’s small but powerful, and you know what they say — it’s not about size, but how you use it.

And that’s what I was planning to do later that night when the phone rang; it was Sean.

“What are you up to?”

“Mia and I both got new vibrators today, and I was just about to give mine a test run.”

“Can I watch?”

See, men do like vibrators after all!

  • Guys, how do you feel about vibrators?
  • Gals, have a favorite model (or two)?
  • Gals, ever have a guy freak about your sex toys?
Dec 1

Kat unleashed

Posted on Tuesday, December 1, 2009 in Kat

sketch-v.1If you’ve found me from my old blog on the IJ, I hope you like my new “home.” If you’re just discovering me, welcome.

So, if you’re wondering why I’ve unleashed myself, well, it’s as simple as this:  I’ve decided to take my blog in a new direction — more posts, shorter posts, edgier posts (meaning I might talk a little bit more about masturbation and porn) — and I wanted the freedom to do that (without making a bunch of biddies get all bent out of shape). You know we kitty kats just hate to be tied up (except when want to be, of course)

You may also notice that I’ve had a few, uh, nips and tucks; hey, the blog is two years old now, and it was time for me to update my image. I’m not getting any younger, after all. But I refuse to Botox or otherwise augment artificially my humorous and thought-provoking (well, I think they are!) musings on dating, parenting, midlife, work, society, singles, men and women, and, of course my favorite subject, sex.

But here’s another thing that hasn’t changed — I blog because I want to get a dialog going, so I hope you’ll stop by and comment. After all, I don’t bite; just a few nips.

****

So, what do you think of my new digs?

***

My first few thoughts here:

I don’t want to enter the fray over Tiger Woods and his, what shall we call it, mishap; I feel sorry that the Woods family has to deal with, well, whatever they’re dealing with in the aftermath of Tiger’s early-morning accident and whatever might have come before. But I’ve been wondering about all the fuss over Tiger’s wife. The question being posed by many bloggers/columnists is, who the heck is Elin Nordegren Woods, anyway?

There isn’t much to read about her! they complain (which speaks well about her, if you ask me).

“We’d like to think the best of her, but we simply don’t know much about her,”

But what are they really saying — that if we read about her in Vanity Fair or People or OK! or see her on Oprah that we would know her? Do we really believe that what we read about a celebrity — or his/her spouse — is the truth? Isn’t it the version of the truth they want us to believe, or that we ourselves want to believe? Would knowing more about Mrs. Woods than the little we “know” — that she had a brief modeling career, grew up in Sweden, has a twin sister and is the child of divorce — make us “know” her,  and would then somehow explain what went on last week? That we could “think the best of her” (and why aren’t we thinking the best of her?)

What do you think?